|
LAW JOURNAL FEATURES Connell Foley LLP WOMEN PARTNERS
Reprinted with permission from the November 1, 1999 New Jersey Law Journal. © 1999 Americal Lawyer Media.
|
NO ACCOMMODATIONS NECESSARY: Pictured, left to right, are partners Karen Painter Randall, Karen Munster Cassidy, Linda Palazzolo and Patricia Pindar of Connell Foley LLP, where 'everyone makes it on their own with no special treatment,' Palazzolo says.
|
Women Show Strong Net Gain In Partnerships
They account for more than half the increase
in partners at the average N.J. firm this year
By Henry Gottlieb
New Jersey Law Journal 09.13.99
|
When Linda Lashbrook was a student
at Rutgers
Law School-Newark in 1980, she and her classmates couldn't help notice that
women constituted half the student population. Our day will come,
they predicted to each other.
With gender parity at the law school level, equal influence
in the legal community would follow, they mused. "We guessed it
would take about 10 years," says Lashbrook, the senior associate
at Woodbridge's Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer.
OK, so it's taking longer, especially if the definition of
influence is being a partner in a large New Jersey firm. The
latest survey of 18 firms the Law Journal has tracked since 1990
shows that 14 percent of the partners are women, compared with 8
percent the first year of the study and 13 percent in 1998 and
1997. (See chart.)
That's progress at a glacial pace, considering the massive
growth of the number of women associates in the past decade.
But there is one sign of faster movement. Since last
October, the net gain in partners at these firms has been 26, and
the net gain in women partners has been 14. In other words, the
elevation of women accounted for more than half the increase in
the number of partners at the average firm. In earlier years,
women's share of the growth in partner ranks never exceeded 25
percent.
Twelve of the firms have more women partners than they did
last year. The number of firms whose percentage of women is below
double digits is three, compared with six in 1998 and 1999, seven
in 1995 and 11 in 1990. And at two firms in the survey for the
first time -- the New Jersey branches of Philadelphia firms --
women account for 15 percent of the partnerships.
The two new firms on the survey are Drinker, Biddle & Reath,
whose 63 partners include those at what was formerly Shanley &
Fisher in Morristown and Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien and Frankel,
whose 45 New Jersey partners are at three locations: Atlantic
City, Lawrenceville and Vorhees. (The two firms said they did not
include Philadelphia-based lawyers who use New Jersey offices
occasionally.)
Women's 14 percent share of the partnerships at the big
firms mirrors the national ratio. Judy Collins, a spokeswoman for
the National Association for Legal Placement says that women
comprise 14.5 percent of the partnerships of NALP member firms
that have between 101 and 250 lawyers.
Growth Tracks National
Trend
As in New Jersey, the percentage around the country is
creeping up slowly. Five years ago, the percentage of women
partners in New Jersey was 12 percent, compared with 12.9 percent
nationally.
Lashbrook suggests that the numbers would be higher in New
Jersey if early 1980s attitudes toward partnership had remained
in effect. Then, an incoming associate could expect to make
partner -- not necessarily a rich one -- by exhibiting legal
talent, loyalty and a willingness to work hard.
Now it's almost impossible for men or women to make partner,
so the rise in the number of women associates hasn't helped.
The 26 new partnerships in the 18 firms, for example,
represents only a 3.52 percent increase over the 758 partnerships
in those firms last year. So it's hard to make partner for women,
despite the gender equality in law schools. According to NALP,
women account for 45 percent of law school students.
It's become almost a cliche that women lawyers who are
raising families prefer corporate law offices to firms because
corporations -- the line goes -- require fewer irregular hours
and are more advanced in their thinking about providing flexible
time for working mothers.
The accepted wisdom also says the pool of prospective women
partners shrinks because women associates drop out to tend to
their families.
Lynn Miller, of New Brunswick's Miller & Miller, says such
themes were discussed last month at a diversity conference she
organized for the Middlesex County Bar Association.
Miller says participants at the conference suggested that
law firms -- particularly the large ones in New Jersey -- have a
clubbier atmosphere than corporations because they started small
and have grown the same way family businesses grow.
"It's them and their friends and their buddies," she says of
these firms. When it comes time to make partners, the question is
"who do they want to have breakfast, lunch and dinner with?"
Still, having more women partners in law firms is inevitable
because the composition of people at corporations who hire firms
is becoming more diverse, speakers at the conference
suggested.
The way to be a woman with power in a law firm is to avoid
the big partnerships, says Miller, who used to be an associate at
Woodbridge's Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel. Some
of the name partners there have enlightened views, she says, but
she prefers her own operation. In her two-lawyer firm, she has
half the power. Her partner, who is her husband, has the other
half.
Off the Mommy
Track
Not every woman has the luxury of having her own firm,
however, and for those in the big ones, a question has been
whether firms are willing to accommodate women partners who have
child-rearing responsibilities.
Karen Painter Randall and Linda Palazzolo, two of the nine
women partners at Roseland's Connell Foley LLP. bristle at
the suggestion such accommodations are necessary. Palazzolo, who
has been a partner since 1980, says "everyone makes it on their
own with no special treatment."
The key to having a high percentage of women partners, they
suggest, is to have a firm that is blind to gender, as Connell,
Foley was in 1968 when it hired its first women partner,
Palazzolo says.
Steven Hoskins, the managing partner at Newark's McCarter &
English and Robert Max Crane, the hiring partner at Newark's
Sills Cummis Radin Tischman Epstein & Gross say their firms do
nothing special to smooth the way for women into partnerships.
"It's not an easy road for a woman who wants to be a full-
time lawyer," Hoskins says of women who take on family
responsibilities. He says the firm does have a part-time policy
for some attorneys, women or men, "if they need it for family
reasons."
When it comes to partnership, though, "We haven't made any
adjustments or compromises or special rules," Hoskins says. "It's
a level playing field."
Debra Rosen, the hiring partner at Haddonfield's Archer &
Greiner, says that at her firm, "we're always concerned about
diversity issues." For women who have family responsibilities,
being able to put in the hours that are required for making
partner can sometimes boil down to something as simple as
location.
Archer & Greiner is in a leafy part of Camden County, within
five minutes of residential areas, so it's easier to be a working
mother there than in, say, Philadelphia, Rosen says.
She says the firm also tries to embrace a nongrinding
lifestyle in which lawyers -- even younger associates -- aren't
expected to spend long weekend hours at the office.
If Archer & Greiner is typical, the numbers of women
associates joining firms can't help but lead to more women
partners. Someday. Every one of the eight second-year law
students who clerked at the firm over the past two summers was a
woman, Rosen says.